The report is the second volume of a report Jack Smith wrote after dropping the federal criminal cases he brought against Donald J. Trump because of his 2024 election victory.

Hundreds of thousands of taxpayer dollars were spent on the probe − don’t taxpayers have a right to see the report?

Three lawsuits — including one from the New York Times — press the case that the special counsel’s final word belongs to the public.

Columbia University and the New York Times are pushing for the special counsel’s report on the Mar-a-Lago case to be publicly ...

Color me "surprised" that some deep-pocketed private citizen or organization hasn’t sued the Department of Justice to get the report by Special Prosecutor Jack ... Cannon, who ruled that Smith ...

Trump plans to make the famous items of evidence part of the 45th and 47th presidents’ presidential library.

The confirmation of the deputy attorney general elevates a lawyer who defeated Special Counsel Jack Smith’s drive to ...

Attorney General Bondi’s antagonism toward special counsels underscores the decisiveness of her pivot away from the prosecutorial posture of her predecessor — and her intent to upend Special Counsel ...

The search was part of the federal investigation into Donald Trump’s alleged mishandling of classified documents and ...

Could Special Counsel Jack Smith, having failed to convict President Trump ... That background attained constitutional salience when Judge Aileen Cannon in south Florida ruled that Mr. Smith was ...

The FBI is returning the property seized during the 2022 raid of Mar-a-Lago to President Trump, according to the White House.