A judge ruled that a former competitor of Thomson Reuters was not permitted to copy its content to build an AI-based legal platform.

In the first AI copyright case ruling, a court concludes that training an AI system using copyrighted material isn't fair use. That will likely be cited by creators fighting other tech giants.

A judge looked at possible copyright infringement defenses for Ross Intelligence and said, ‘I reject them all.’ ...

The Thomson Reuters decision has big implications for the battle between generative AI companies and rightsholders.

Hollowed-out homes. Cars entombed by mud. Unpeopled roads. Belongings reduced to dirt and debris. It all took a toll on ...

If you submit a picture, you do so in accordance with the BBC's Terms and Conditions and the BBC's privacy policy. In ...

Does using AI make you less of an artist? The US Copyright Office has weighed in on the debate. Its ruling could reshape copyright law as we know it.

The agency referred back to laws established in the early days of computers to distinguish between copyrightable works ...

Zoe Lofgren (Dem-CA) has introduced H.R. 791, the Foreign Anti-Digital Piracy Act (or FADPA), to prevent foreign-run piracy ...

Office lacked understanding of AI image program, artist says Artist seeks to reverse decision denying his work protection An artist suing the US Copyright Office over ...

As AI technologies like ChatGPT continue to evolve, their intersection with copyright law is becoming a global legal battleground. The outcome of this case in India could set important precedents ...

The Federal Circuit has approved of various apportionment methodologies when considering lost profits indicators in a reasonable royalty analysis ... Federal Circuit law does not allow [the damages ...